Femininity

Hey ladies! It occurred to me that femininity, and what it really looks like, can be a topic that a lot of women disagree on. What do you think makes a woman “feminine?” Where is the line between being “feminine” and being just plain vain? Obviously, that kind of a line can be sensitive (particularly for people who might skirt pretty close to someone else’s version of what is “vain” rather than what is “feminine” — myself included). What do you think makes a woman “womanly?” [Editor's note: no anatomical lessons necessary] What are some of the things that most women share, and what are some areas where women differ from each other while still being feminine? Do you even think that “femininity” exists?



Well, I was going to make an anatomical reference until you said that anatomical lessons aren’t necessary. :) Let me think about this one for a bit before I give my thoughts. I know I like the dichotomy of being feminine and yet a tomboy at heart, so I need to explore the differences/similarities on what would define femininity to me. Interesting subject!



Oh man. This is a really good one, Sally. But oh so controversial! The topic has actually been on my mind a lot lately, in reference to the roles of men and women in relationships/marriage and how this reflects God’s design for us as women. I think there’s a lot to be learned here. I’m almost done reading this book called “The Allure of Hope” and it has some really fantastic and I think even revolutionary ideas about femininity and desire, from a Biblical perspective. I will try to summarize some of the points:

1. We (women) were designed to carry in us the memory of a better place, a perfect place (Eden, aka God’s Kingdom) and this memory should instill in us a desire for better, a longing for what we don’t have, and ultimately, cause us to hope in the One who has promised these things. And this simultaneous desire and hope displays our beauty, our delicacy, our loveliness.

2. But we are so afraid of disappointment, and so averse to pain (our society has trained us that way!) that we push desire aside, and either choose to work in our own strength to get what we want or resign ourselves to a less than fulfilling life. We fill the painful and empty places of desire with chores, affairs, addictions, empty relationships, shopping, eating, etc., instead of letting ourselves sit in the longing and grow to trust in a God that has promised us a truly fulfilling future.

So I guess all this to say (sorry for the book report!), I’m beginning to believe that choosing to hope, instead of settling for emptiness or clamoring in my own power, can be a beautiful display of my femininity. This last quote was one of my favorites:

“We are far more disciplined than we are at rest, far more committed than winsome, far more “nice” than passionate, far more dutiful than free. Far more weary than filled with hope … Our femininity, our artistry, is transformed as our hearts are captured by the goodness of God in the midst of our hard-heartedness.”



What our readers do not know (or DID not know until now:)), is that this topic has been up for almost a week and we have barely made a comment. There is a strange tension and uncertainty associated with attempting to “pin down” femininity.

Femininity is somehow simultaneously personal and universal. You know it when you see it … or when you’re BE-ing it … and yet it is strangely intangible. All of us can hear the nagging voice of a mother or grandmother saying, “act like a lady” … but that usually just meant don’t belch or cuss or play in the dirt when you’re dressed up in your Sunday best.

I’ve just written two paragraphs and essentially said nothing, so let me just say this:

I feel feminine when my nails are manicured … when my hair is done … when my outfit is “cute”. I also feel feminine when I’m working and I use my God given intelligence to solve a complex problem and lead others to a solution. I feel feminine when I’m caring well for the people in my life who depend on me and I feel equally feminine when I’m away from those people pampering myself.

The Bible has a lot to say about femininity, but too often we attach ourselves to one or two aspects of femininity and make those our working definition. Just like with so many things Biblical, femininity requires living in the tension between the extremes of self-sacrifice and self-service, self-neglect and vanity, weakness and self-confidence, passivity and dominance.



Yeah, I’m at at loss. I don’t really know how to nail down what feminine is. I don’t know if feminine beauty is what we’re going for, but that’s all I’ve got, so here goes. I have a seven-year-old (almost eight as she always points out) daughter. When God gave us a girl, I knew I needed to solidify with myself, and with her, what true beauty is. We talk about 1 Peter 3:3-5 often …

Don’t be concerned about the outward beauty that depends on fancy hairstyles, expensive jewelry, or beautiful clothes. You should be known for the beauty that comes from within, the unfading beauty of a gentle and quiet spirit, which is so precious to God. That is the way the holy women of old made themselves beautiful.

We talk about how there is nothing wrong with fixing our hair or wearing nice clothes, but this is NOT beauty, according to scripture. That kind of beauty fades. We are not to be “concerned”, pre-occupied, or distracted by it. I want my daughter and I to both have a right understanding of where beauty comes from — within, and from a gentle and quiet SPIRIT. I don’t think that means we all have the same personality by any means! But our spirit emanates gentleness and peace. 1 Peter also points out that “beautiful women” are submissive to authority. This is feminine. I think we can still be funny, smart, articulate, competent, and strong leaders! But as far as feminine beauty goes, we need to be de-programmed a bit.

I hope this fits into the discussion you were going for Sally!



Yeah, I agree that this is hard to put into words. I will say that when I start getting confused (again) about what God wants me to be like as a woman, I reference Proverbs 31 — all of it. It is a very challenging example. This gal is hard-working, mature, wise, crafty, merciful and well-kept. She is not stressed-out (verse 25) and her most striking traits are her strength, dignity, and fear of the Lord. That is a beautiful picture of femininity to me.

We are created in the image of Christ, so we somehow “look” like Christ. That challenges me to think of the feminine qualities of Christ — the image of God in the flesh — which is, honestly, controversial in my mind (to think of Christ as feminine). But as I read the scriptures, I see that God is merciful and comforting and close to the broken-hearted. God gathers his children like a mother hen, and cares about every single hair on our head. He rejoices and weeps and throws parties for lost children coming home — He is emotional! He is detail-oriented and works in orderly ways. These things are, to me, pictures of femininity that I can reflect. It’s not that guys don’t have these qualities, but we as women SHINE in these qualities — it’s how we are wired.

That said, I’m all ears. I want to be feminine. Some of it comes naturally, some of it doesn’t. What do we do about the traits that seem foreign to us? Write them off as not-my-personality? What is mandatory for femininity?



You guys are giving a lot of food for thought here. I was glad to see some references that had come to mind as I was thinking through this topic — Proverbs 31, 1 Peter 3:3-5, etc. You have hit on some powerful descriptives of our nature as women in those verses. Erica - also loved the summary you gave on the book you are reading. I want to read that book!

To be completely honest with you, my CL friends (and that is what we are supposed to be doing on here, right?), the one thought that keeps coming back to me when I think about the topic of “femininity” is how our current culture allows (often times) for this concept to be mixed up. In particular what I am trying to reference here is the concept of “identity confusion/crisis” — when life experiences/circumstances are interpreted such that one “identifies” more with the masculine sex (as opposed to being a “woman”). This topic is NOT about the struggles of homosexuality (I note that we addressed that topic several blogs ago, even), but it does come to mind when we talk about “femininity” because of conversations I have had with students who find themselves struggling to identify more with their feminine traits. We can miss how we were intended to operate - our unique attributes as “female” as opposed to “male.” As to exactly what the crossover traits of identifying more with masculinity than femininity are, I am not certain. I do not believe that “femininity” is just appearance, it is a part of the heart - our makeup. Most of you have already addressed this, so I just wanted to point out that there is this other part to this discussion. As it has been explained to me - the sub-issue is when one is “feminine” as in “woman” but does not identify with such traits. Is there a way to “recapture” one’s femininity then?



I think that other side of the discussion can be a huge issue, Nikki! I’ve met a lot of women who don’t feel like they “fit the mold” of what they (or society, or their church, or their friends) think of as feminine. Maybe they don’t like to giggle about boys, or paint their nails, or cook (don’t get me started on that one). Maybe they want to have a career rather than staying at home with kids (don’t get my friends started on that one). Whatever it is, a lot of women have an idea of what they need to be in order to be “good at” being a woman. I agree that femininity goes to the heart. I think that the women who struggle with the idea that they’re not “fitting the mold” sometimes need to hear that they can be feminine without being June Cleaver (if you’ve never heard of her, just think 1950s housewife).

That said, I’ve heard a pastor describe the Bible’s version of women as being “helpers” or “sustainers.” In Genesis, before Eve came along, the Bible says that Adam needed a helper/sustainer. Just so we’re clear, the word for helper/sustainer didn’t mean “subservient,” but it meant that Adam needed someone to nurture and encourage him. When I think about that, it makes sense. A lot of women feel the urge to nurture people (or puppies) in their lives. Granted, not every woman feels the need to coo at every baby they meet, but a lot of women seem to have a natural tendency to invest themselves personally and emotionally in what they love. Does that make sense to anyone, or am I just reciting the same stereotypes which are causing the problem?



Ok. After a lot of thought (and some talks with my girlfriends!) I think I’m ready to re-tackle this topic. I really like what has been said, especially KJ’s line about living in the tension between extremes. I think that is where a lot of us find ourselves … struggling between being two versions of what we “ought” to be.

Ok. First things first: men and women were both made in God’s image, and so I believe that as women, we were designed to reflect God’s character and glory both in ways that we share with men, and in ways that we are uniquely able to offer (or at least offer more fully … ?). Here are a few traits I see as being more a part of a woman’s design: tenderness (but not weakness), strength (but not arrogance), creativity, winsomeness (but not vanity), insight and intuition. Unfortunately, society can so easily misunderstand, misuse and pervert these qualities. I often feel like I’m working so hard just to re-claim what these words mean!

And I don’t believe these traits can be cultivated just by thinking “I should be more tender. I will be more tender!” Often insincere attempts at achieving “femininity” (say, in order to be more attractive to men) can be very dangerous to our identity in the long run. I think that probably the best way to cultivate femininity is to first recognize our freedom in Christ: freedom to grow into our identity as women (knowing that our worth doesn’t depend on what we do), freedom in not having to be perfect (knowing that we serve the One who is), freedom to love others (knowing that we are perfectly loved).

And ultimately, women are the bearers of new life! Right? That’s a pretty clear difference! Our very bodies carry and offer life in a way that men are unequipped for. I don’t know what this means, exactly, but what I want to say is that this means we have a very special role in the work of restoration and new life that Christ will bring.

What do you guys think? It’s still pretty fuzzy to me …



Erica, excellent point about not being able to just “try harder” to be sensitive or compassionate. These character changes or growths can only happen with regeneration that comes through the Holy Spirit’s work in us. I love easy fixes and pat answers, but this one seems to come with more of a long-term plan. Having the long-term plan of becoming like Christ comes with the daily task of choosing to be like Him — fully feminine, simply because I’m a woman reflecting Christ — in the small things.

So, practically speaking for myself and following the examples of Godly women and the first woman … I am challenged to focus my energies on supporting, nurturing, responding to, sharing wisdom, and encouraging the people in my life. These can be applied to my phone conversations, check-out line interactions, committee meeting discourse, and the way I spend my time. I am tempted to take control constantly, and often it takes what feels like brute strength to step back and be the supporter. I wish our culture hadn’t implied weakness and confusion to these humble and God-reflecting traits.


16 Responses to “Femininity”

  1. Carrie Says:

    Ok ladies,
    This is a wonderful neat philosophical discussion that I’ve heard many times from many sources, but what’s it really MEAN? You’ve mentioned the girls that don’t feel like they fit the mold, but (I’ll admit I am one!) what do you have to say to those girls? Women are supposed to be nurturing, encouraging, sustainers and bearers of life, and that’s great but how does that apply in the dorm hallway? the giant lecture hall? hanging out in the student center or at a party? How do we reconcile our tomboy tendencies with true femininity? Are they necessarily at odds? What about the real live women of the Bible? Ruth was incredibly brave, daring, and hardworking, yet in all of that she was being obedient to Naomi and caring for her. What about Deborah? She led Israel into battle and the men wouldn’t go without her. What can we learn from Rahab or Bathsheba? Is there anything to see and model in their lives?

    Bottom line of this comment: Can you get a little more practical and a little less pretty package that makes me feel a trapped and exposed as a fraud?

  2. Emily K. Says:

    I just wrote the longest, most passionate response to one of these blogs I’ve ever written, forgot to input my name, hit “back” when it wouldn’t post, and everything was gone.

    I am frustrated.

    I will try to come back when I don’t have homework I’ve been procrastinating on while crafting an impeccable argument… *sigh

  3. Nikki Says:

    Emily - please post yoru comment again! We want to hear from you!

    Carrie - you raise some great questions/issues in your comment. I think some of our other bloggers will have better practical advice for you than I can give, but I do think that one small part of “tapping into” our femininity is to take a look at how we dress (I’ll just throw this one out here). I have been around students who dressed like guys (athletic/boxy t-shirts, long soccer shorts - for guys, not girls, etc.) and were literally looking more like men than women. Maybe how we look on the outside reflects how we feel on the inside? Just a thought… and for the record, several of us on here used to dress more like guys than girls….KJ - isn’t that right? :) I just wonder about how our outward view reflects our inner view. Sort of reminds me of the movie with Sandra Bullock where she was the FBI agent who had to become a beauty pageant contestant…

  4. Carrie Says:

    Nikki,
    My first reaction was to argue with you about the clothing thing… but then I thought a little more about it, and I think you’re right in saying that a lot of times our outward appearance tends to reflect our inner feelings/views of ourselves. So I’ll pose this question: Is there a difference between looking/feeling feminine and genuinely being feminine (perhaps as seen a little more objectively by others)? Said another way, do you think it is possible to be feminine without being aware of it or blinded to it - or do we just all need to start wearing a lot of pink dresses? ;-)

  5. erica Says:

    These are really good questions, Carrie. Thanks for pushing us on the “practicality” thing. I think there definitely IS a difference between feeling feminine and being feminine, and I think it all has to do with our definition of femininity. I don’t think that baggy boy clothes, in and of themselves, reflect a lack of femininity. But I would ask, what sort of heart-issues are these clothes a manifestation of? It is simply more comfortable to wear t-shirts? Or is it because this girl is afraid of male attention? Sorry to bring it back to the theoretical level, but I think it really all centers on what our heart believes about God, about our design, about our identity.

    Something we didn’t really touch on in the blog is the issue of men in today’s society not being real men (or displaying real masculinity) which I think is a huge factor in how we perceive our own roles as women, and how we portray ourselves as females. If men around us aren’t leading, aren’t displaying respect and delight in women well, then we might feel either like we have to embody these traits ourselves, or we must “hole up” and protect ourselves. Unfortunately, when men aren’t being men, sometimes women aren’t free to be women.

  6. kelly Says:

    Erica, I have to disagree with you girl…I don’t think our femininity is dependent at all on whether men are being men. A woman can be a leader or be the boss at work and still be feminine. Even if NO man is delighting in us, we are still feminine.
    We need to take ownership of our femininity. Nikki, you are right about me spending much of my life dressing like a boy…partially because I was a tomboy, but mostly because I was so insecure in myself that I hid behind baggy shorts and oversized T-shirts.
    I do think dressing like a woman is important. Not all the time. But not never. So Carrie, my practical advice is to look around at your friends and find a few who you perceive as very feminine. Humble yourself and ask them to teach you some things about dressing for your body type, wearing make up, and expressing your femininity.
    And if you’re feeling discouraged, just ask to see a few pictures of me in highschool…there’s hope for everyone.
    kj

  7. kelly Says:

    oh, and Nikki, I like the Miss Congeniality reference. She came into her own a little when forced to put a dress and some makeup on!

  8. erica Says:

    KJ, Thanks for pushing me on the masculinity thing. I don’t think that it’s impossible to be feminine when men aren’t being masculine, I was just saying that I think it can be HARDER. Of course we need to pursue God’s design for us as women regardless what other people around us are doing, but I do still think that our tendency to deny parts of our femininity is influenced by what men around us are saying and doing. And I certainly don’t think that a girl has to be in a committed relationship to be truly feminine! I was speaking more about all the various men in our lives (fathers, brothers, friends, and if you happen to have one, a boyfriend or husband). Now that I’ve clarified myself, what do you think? Do we agree?

  9. Emily K. Says:

    While there’s no way to resurrect a beautifully written argument– which I had and lost– here is what my basic point was, without the wittiness. (Can you tell I’m disappointed?? Oy….)

    Anyway…

    These three words: feminine, femininity, and womanly are not anywhere to be found in the Bible.

    The word, feminine, as defined by dictionary.com:

    1. pertaining to a woman or girl: feminine beauty; feminine dress.
    2. having qualities traditionally ascribed to women, as sensitivity or gentleness.
    3. effeminate; womanish: a man with a feminine walk.
    4. belonging to the female sex; female: feminine staff members.

    and another definition from merriam-webster.com:

    2: characteristic of or appropriate or unique to women

    Okay. That lays out pretty well what you’ve all been talking about, but, here’s where I really take issue: the etymology.

    First: Middle English, from Anglo-French feminin, from Latin femininus.
    Second: It dates to the 14th century. The 1300’s!!!

    Okay. Now. I’ll be really honest and say I find it insulting to equate femininity with clothes, or with what we consider ‘girly’ things these days. It is all, in my view, absolutely contextual and cultural. The women in Jesus’ day wore nearly the same thing the men did. And they certainly didn’t get manicures or their hair done.

    So. If it IS contextual and cultural, then, is it Biblical to define this thing called femininity that doesn’t even exist in those terms in the Bible?

    Thus, I won’t apologize for the things I do that are considered more ‘masculine.’ It’s just a word issue to me, and a language barrier, to boot. I am created the way I have been created, with all my traits and quirks and sins and beautiful aspects too. I tend to think that people of this century have a need to “DEFINE” everything, and I don’t like it. I feel no need to “reconcile my tomboy tendencies” because I absolutely love to go trekking in the woods, climb trees, get bruised and scraped up from rock jumping, and getting SWEATY too. For me, spending money on beautification, beyond getting my hair cut, is impractical and a waste of the few resources I have. I have a best girl friend that just isn’t good with babies… just doesn’t like them… she’s a Christian… and how DARE we call her not feminine? Perhaps, she isn’t wired that way because God has other purposes for her. I disagree that one can “feel” feminine… at least in the ways defined by the examples given above.

    Okay. And now the last kicker. I can be a feminist. But what do I mean? All that means to me is that I know how to filter the situations of this world through the filter of “How does this affect the women here?” so as to gain a better understanding of that situation. This is a tangent, but I wanted to throw it out there. I think this kind of critique is necessary in a world that largely ignores the role of women and how women are affected by various circumstances/situations.

    Okay. Shoot.

  10. Emily K. Says:

    Eh… don’t know why half my post is in blue… just throwin that out there.

    Also… please, please, I welcome correction in all that I said above. I heartily recognize that too few of my views are shaped by God or Scripture and too many by the world.

  11. Sally Says:

    Emily, first of all, I love your honesty. I think that a LOT of women bristle against the baby-loving, manicure-getting stereotype of what is “feminine.” Both you and Carrie have brought up excellent points about how a one-size-fits-all definition of femininity can be hurtful and condemning to women who don’t naturally fit it. For that, though, I’d like to point you towards Proverbs, chapter 31 for a good, and maybe comforting, version of what femininity can be. I’ve always found that chapter comforting - I don’t fit the mold of the frilly-pink-dress girl, but those verses describe a real woman, not just an empty stereotype.

    Look at verse 17 - this woman isn’t avoiding work to protect her manicure. Throughout the chapter, this woman is shown as a woman with a head for business, who manages what she has well. The people around her depend on her. This might be the closest thing to a Biblical picture of femininity, and this woman is doing things which aren’t far off from trekking through the woods.

    And then there’s 1 Peter 3:3, which says that we’re not supposed to focus, as women, on outward appearances, but to focus on developing godly character. But I hope it’s clear that we’re not trying to define femininity as “must wear pink dresses,” but that we’re trying to get at the root of what femininity really is. That includes the heart level, not just what you wear or whether you like babies.

    I don’t know if that helps. But your points reminded me of those passages in the Bible, so I hope that they help flesh this out for you! In any case, let me know what you come up with - I like trekking through the woods myself, so I’m hoping (and pretty confident) that Biblical femininity has room for that!

  12. Emily K. Says:

    I understand what you’re getting at, Carrie, my whole issue though is in regards to even the use of “femininity” in trying to describe… anything.

    I don’t think that the scriptural passages you point to depict “Biblical femininity”… because I don’t even like the word. Does that make sense? I may totally be wrong in this, but, to me what those passages point to is how a woman who loves God will be shaped to fit his character, because she’ll put her hope in God, she’ll work hard, use the mind God gave her, be generous. But I don’t consider any of those things feminine… because I just really disagree with us using the word, I find the word too wrapped up in cultural and contextual meanings to glean anything Biblical from it.

    I am wondering though, why I dislike it so much, and so I’ll be looking into that.

  13. Emily K. Says:

    OH my… I do things like that often… saw Carrie’s name at the top of the list and so wrote it: I meant to address you Sally!! My apologies… :)

  14. erica Says:

    Emily, thanks for the comments! I’m really glad you’re pressing us on some of these issues.

    Just a question of clarification: Do you disagree with concept of “Biblical femininity” because you think there really are no generalizable personality/design differences between men and women, or because you think the term needs to be revamped due to too much cultural/societal baggage?

  15. Emily K. Says:

    Because the term needs to be revamped due to too much cultural/societal baggage.

    I most definitely think there are generalizable personality/design differences between men and women. MOST DEFINITELY. :)

    I just don’t think that they necessarily fit what our society and culture calls masculine/feminine, and that rather they’re a whole different set of identifiers. I think the best we can call it is being a Godly man or a Godly woman, or saying a woman after God’s heart, or a man after God’s heart. I see masculinity/femininity as having nothing to do with it… those are just words, to me, that our culture uses to define those generalizable differences, but I don’t think they fit the Biblical picture.

  16. Kat Says:

    Even though I don’t hate the word “feminine” (it does communicate - in some contexts - what we need it to), I can see what Emily is getting at. All the things that first come to mind when I hear the word “feminine” are comparably shallow. It’s not that I think makeup, skirts and manicures are bad - I like all those things. It’s just that makeup is nothing compared to confidence. Skirts are nothing compared to faithfulness and manicures are nothing compared to compassion. The way I interpret what God is saying (as Jen pointed out above) is that blush, lip gloss and mascara just don’t make us more beautiful to Him (Imagine the designer of your face watching you cover it up…or make it “better”). However, I imagine putting on some gentleness, some self control or some forgiveness would make you shine even brighter in His eyes.

    On another note, I’m especially glad that liking babies isn’t a Biblical trait ascribed to women alone. Just look at any new father. I would say a good percentage of both sexes don’t melt over babies that aren’t theirs. I think there are a lot of underlying reasons guys don’t go up to babies and coo, but I doubt the main one is “I don’t like them”. At least I hope not…hmmm…where did my stacks of statistics go?

    Thanks for all your thoughts CL ladies!

Leave a Reply